The Paris AtlasCharting the artists, works, and places worth returning to.
A woman at the wheel of a green car, seen through the open window. She wears a grey leather motoring helmet, a gold earring and a heavy grey scarf wound at her neck; her mouth is painted red and she looks sideways out of the frame. One gloved hand rests on the steering wheel. The car's green bodywork fills the lower half.

Artwork reproduction

PaintingArt Deco

Self-Portrait (Tamara in a Green Bugatti)

by Tamara de Lempicka

Tamara de Lempicka painted this self-portrait in 1929 for the German magazine Die Dame. She shows herself at the wheel of a green Bugatti in a motoring cap, gloves and pale scarf, the forms polished and sharply modelled. She did not own the car: she drove a yellow Renault. At 35 by 27 centimetres the panel is much smaller than its reputation suggests, and it remains in a private collection.

Created
1929
Medium
Oil on panel

About Tamara de Lempicka

Illustrated portrait of Tamara de Lempicka
Tamara de Lempicka

1 work catalogued

Overview

**Tamara in a Green Bugatti** is a self-portrait in which Tamara de Lempicka presents herself through the fashionable imagery of driving. Created for the German magazine *Die Dame*, it combines portrait painting with commercial illustration and carefully constructed public identity. The subject is both the artist herself and a particular conception of the modern woman.[1]

Composition and Appearance

Lempicka appears close to the viewer, wearing a fitted motoring cap, gloves, and a pale scarf. Her red lips interrupt the restrained colors around her face, while the green automobile supplies a strong contrast. The forms are sharply modeled and polished, giving both the figure and the machine a sculptural presence. Her expression is controlled rather than conversational, reinforcing the image's air of self-possession.[1]

The combination of geometry and physical solidity belongs to Lempicka's broader artistic approach. Her work brought together lessons from Cubism with an interest in Renaissance painting, classical traditions, and artists such as Ingres. Contemporary fashion and theatrical presentation also informed her imagery. These influences allowed her to create figures that seemed simultaneously modern and deliberately removed from ordinary, casual observation.[2]

The Bugatti She Did Not Own

The famous automobile was an element of artistic self-fashioning: **Lempicka actually drove a yellow Renault**, not the green Bugatti shown in the painting. The substitution made the portrait an aspirational image rather than a literal account of her possessions.[1]

A frequently repeated story claims that a publisher noticed her driving in Monte Carlo and commissioned the portrait after being struck by her appearance. The account has the appeal of a chance discovery, but it is difficult to accept uncritically: Lempicka had already worked for *Die Dame*. The story fits the glamorous identity she cultivated better than it establishes a secure history of the commission.[1]

The Modern Woman and the Automobile

The painting belongs to a period in which images of female independence were being negotiated through fashion, work, leisure, and consumer culture. Art historian **Paula J. Birnbaum** examines the portrait as part of Lempicka's engagement with the modern woman and the commercialization of her image. The automobile offers an especially effective setting because it connects personal mobility with industrial modernity and expensive consumption.[3]

The portrait can consequently be read as more than a straightforward declaration of liberation. Its independence is highly styled and associated with privilege. At the same time, Lempicka is not merely a model chosen by someone else to embody that ideal: she is the artist constructing the image. This relationship between self-representation and a commercially desirable identity is one of the work's enduring tensions.[3]

Paris and Artistic Reinvention

Lempicka's interwar career developed within the cosmopolitan artistic environment of Paris, where her distinctive portraits found an audience. Her paintings combined fashionable subjects with an approach that did not require viewers to choose between recognizable figures and modern formal experimentation. The resulting style could function in exhibitions, private collections, and the visual culture surrounding fashion and celebrity.[2]

Reputation and Collection

The small scale of the original is worth emphasizing: at **35 × 27 centimeters**, it is far smaller than its monumental reputation might suggest. Its private ownership also distinguishes it from paintings that can be associated with a permanent public gallery. The Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco's artwork information identifies it as belonging to a private collection; the availability of museum-authorized reproductions does not mean that institution owns the original.[4]

A 1972 exhibition at the Galerie du Luxembourg helped renew interest in Lempicka's work. That rediscovery contributed to the later prominence of her interwar paintings as images of Art Deco sophistication. The Green Bugatti portrait remains particularly effective because its artistic language and its subject reinforce one another: a meticulously fashioned modern identity is presented through an equally controlled painting style.[2]

Close reading

Reading the work, detail by detail

The painting is small, 35 by 27 centimetres, and almost all of it is car. The details show the few places Lempicka lets skin and fabric interrupt the metal, and how little of the vehicle she actually describes.

Close view of the painted face, the eyes turned to the side under a heavy lid rather than meeting the viewer

1.The look, which is sideways

She is not looking at the viewer. The eyes are turned to the side under heavy lids, which is what gives the portrait its reputation for coldness. The face is modelled in smooth planes with no visible brushwork.

Close view of the painted red lips, the only strong warm colour in the upper half of the picture

2.The red mouth

The lips are the one hot colour above the bodywork, set against grey leather, grey scarf and pale skin. A gold earring picks the warmth up again just beside it.

Close view of the grey leather driving helmet covering the hair, with a strap running down past the cheek

3.The motoring helmet

A close leather helmet covers the hair entirely and a strap runs down past the cheek. It is working motoring kit rather than a hat, and it removes the one feature a 1929 fashion portrait would normally use.

Close view of a gloved hand resting over the rim of the steering wheel, the fingers modelled as smooth cylinders

4.The hand on the wheel

The hand lies over the wheel rather than gripping it. The fingers are smooth cylinders with no knuckles described, modelled like the sheet metal around them.

Close view of the heavy grey scarf wound at the neck, its folds modelled in hard-edged planes

5.The scarf, painted like metal

The scarf is wound in thick folds, and each fold is given a hard edge and a flat highlight. It is painted the same way as the car's panels, which is what makes the figure and the machine look made of one substance.

Close view of the lower half of the picture, filled with the green door and wing of the car and a chrome handle

6.The car is mostly one green shape

Below the window line there is almost no detail: a door, a wing, a chrome handle and a long highlight. Lempicka gives the car nothing a mechanic would recognise, which is consistent with the fact that she did not own one.

Where to see it

A viewing location has not yet been listed for this work.

Frequently asked questions

Did Tamara de Lempicka own a green Bugatti?

No. She drove a yellow Renault. The green Bugatti in the painting is an invention, which makes the portrait an aspirational image rather than a record of what she owned.

Why did Lempicka paint this self-portrait?

It was made for the German magazine Die Dame. The painting therefore sits between portraiture and commercial illustration, and its subject is both Lempicka herself and a particular idea of the modern woman.

Is the story about Monte Carlo true?

It is hard to accept as it stands. The story says a publisher saw her driving in Monte Carlo and commissioned the portrait on the spot. Lempicka had already worked for Die Dame, so the tale fits the glamorous identity she cultivated better than it establishes how the commission actually happened.

How big is Tamara in a Green Bugatti?

35 by 27 centimetres, oil on panel. It is much smaller than its reputation suggests.

Where is the painting now?

In a private collection. Museum-authorised reproductions are sold, but that does not mean a museum owns the original.

In the atlas

What the graph records about this work — every claim carries its citation.

Associated with · 1929–1939

Art Deco

The self-portrait is the painting most often used to picture Art Deco: polished forms, fashion and the imagery of speed, made for a magazine rather than a gallery. Lempicka painted herself in a car she did not own.

Self-Portrait (Tamara in a Green Bugatti) — Tamara Łempicka; My Portrait (Tamara in the Green Bugatti), 1929 — Art on Demand record; Tamara de Lempicka — exhibition

Depicts

Tamara de Lempicka

The painting is a self-portrait: Lempicka painted herself at the wheel for the German magazine Die Dame in 1929. The car is not hers — she drove a yellow Renault.

Self-Portrait (Tamara in a Green Bugatti) — Tamara Łempicka; My Portrait (Tamara in the Green Bugatti), 1929 — Art on Demand record

If you like Tamara de Lempicka

Explore painters from the same movements and circles.

  • Illustrated portrait of Georges Braque

    Georges Braque

    The Le Havre house-painter's son who invented Cubism in Montmartre with the Spanish painter Pablo Picasso between 1908 and 1914 — the quieter half of the most consequential partnership in modern art — and who invented papier collé, the pasted-paper picture, in September 1912. He was given a French state funeral in 1963.

    View artist
  • AC

    A. M. Cassandre

    French poster designer whose advertisements for railways, liners and aperitifs — Nord Express, Dubonnet, Normandie — reduced their subjects to a few commanding shapes.

    View artist
  • Illustrated portrait of Paul Cézanne

    Paul Cézanne

    Painter between Impressionism and everything after — shown in the independents' exhibitions, emulated by the Cubists, and present at the Orangerie through 15 works in the Walter-Guillaume collection.

    View artist
References

References

The sources below include collection records, catalogues, scholarly research, and primary materials that informed this page. They document Self-Portrait (Tamara in a Green Bugatti), its making, and its place in cultural history.

  1. 1abcdSelf-Portrait (Tamara in a Green Bugatti) — Tamara Łempicka

    Website
    Culture.pl
    Used for

    The commission for Die Dame, the yellow Renault Lempicka actually drove, and the frequently repeated Monte Carlo story about how the portrait came about.

    View source
  2. 2abcTamara de Lempicka — exhibition

    Website
    Museum of Fine Arts, Houston
    Used for

    Her artistic influences, her interwar career in Paris, and the 1972 Galerie du Luxembourg exhibition that renewed interest in her work.

    View source
  1. 3abTamara de Łempicka — uosobienie współczesnej kobiety

    Periodical
    Archiwum Emigracji. Studia – Szkice – Dokumenty, nos. 1–2 (16–17), pp. 116–126, 2012
    Used for

    Scholarly analysis of the self-portrait, modern womanhood, artistic identity and the commercialization of the female image.

    View source
  2. 4My Portrait (Tamara in the Green Bugatti), 1929 — Art on Demand record

    Website
    Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco
    Used for

    Artwork information giving the medium, the 35 by 27 cm dimensions, the 1929 date, and the private-collection status. Also cataloged there as My Portrait (Tamara in the Green Bugatti).

    View source
i
Why these sources are here

These references provide the documented foundation for this work's history and interpretation. Claim-level citations remain attached to the specific claims they support.

Explore more resources