
Viktualienmarkt with St Peter's Church, Munich
by Adolf Hitler
A watercolour of Munich's food market below the tower of St Peter's, attributed to Adolf Hitler. It hung in a private war museum in Massachusetts until the museum closed in 2019, and where it went is not on record.
- Undated
- Watercolour
About Adolf Hitler
The view
The Viktualienmarkt is Munich's open food market, a square of stalls just south-east of Marienplatz, and the tower behind it belongs to the church of St Peter, the oldest parish church in the city. The two make one of the standard Munich views, which is the sort of subject the picture's painter worked from.
Nothing else about the object is documented. It carries no recorded date, no dimensions and no published inventory number.
The pictures were copies, and the copying was a trade
Adolf Hitler painted views he had in front of him on paper, not views he was standing in. He worked from postcards, prints and photographs, and the surviving sheets repeat the same landmarks because the postcards did.
Selling them was a small commercial operation with a partner in it. Reinhold Hanisch handled the Vienna sales from about 1910, taking the watercolours round frame dealers and tourists for a cut, until the two men quarrelled over money. Hitler moved to Munich in 1913 and kept to the same routine, selling small sheets to dealers and visitors, without much success at it.
“He had no style of his own as a painter, but generally just copied.”
Nobody knows where it is
The watercolour was on display at the International Museum of World War II in Natick, Massachusetts, a private museum open by reservation from 1999 to 2019 that held more than seven thousand objects. It closed in 2019.
Where the collection went has not been established, and no later owner, sale or loan of this picture is on record. That is the honest answer to the question of its whereabouts: unknown, as of August 2026.
One provenance claim attaches to it. The description filed with the 2015 photograph says the watercolour was given by Hitler to Rudolf Hess. No museum label, catalogue or sale record supporting that has been found, so it stands as an assertion rather than a documented chain. The companion Alter Hof watercolour photographed at the same museum carries a similar claim, that it was a gift to his chief adjutant Wilhelm Brückner, and it is unverified on the same terms. Whether either is the same object as the Alter Hof sheet reproduced in 1936 and reported to be in United States Army custody is not established; they may be different pictures of the same courtyard.
Why the attribution needs saying carefully
Works signed with Hitler's name are forged in quantity, and have been for ninety years. Reinhold Hanisch, who had sold the real ones in Vienna, was producing fakes by 1933; he was arrested in 1936 and died in custody the year after. Two seizures in 2019 show the modern trade: three watercolours taken from a Berlin auction house in January, sixty-three from Auktionshaus Weidler in Nuremberg in February, on suspicion of document forgery and fraud.
Checking a sheet against the literature does not help either. The catalogue the trade uses, Billy F. Price's Adolf Hitler: The Unknown Artist of 1984, was compiled by one of the material's largest private owners, includes works the historian Hermann Weiss identified as forgeries by Konrad Kujau, and is dedicated to August Priesack, who signed certificates of authenticity for paintings and vouched for the Hitler diaries.
“No one has really conducted any serious comprehensive research into Hitler's art.”
That is why the provenance of this picture matters more than its brushwork. A painter who copied postcards left no personal handwriting for a connoisseur to recognise, so the usual test for a forgery has almost nothing to work with, and the questions that remain are documentary ones: who owned it, when, and what proves it.
This page shows a photograph, not the painting
The image here is Lee Wright's photograph of the watercolour on display in Natick, taken on 5 December 2015 and released under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 licence. The credit is a condition of using it.
The distinction is not a formality. A flat, faithful copy of a painting that is out of copyright creates no new rights, in German law and in American practice alike. A photograph of a framed object in a museum room is a photograph, made by someone who chose the angle and the light, and it belongs to the photographer.
The painting itself is out of copyright
Copyright in everything Adolf Hitler made expired on 1 January 2016, seventy years after the end of the year in which he died. Sheets like this one, sold as single originals and never published with the copyright owner's authority, came out of copyright in the United States on the same date.
Before that the rights belonged to the Free State of Bavaria, which inherited the estate after a Munich court declared the will void and denazification proceedings in 1948 transferred the assets. Bavaria used the copyright to withhold permission rather than to earn from it, blocking German reprints of Mein Kampf for decades. The copyright never covered the objects, which had been in private hands since they were sold before the First World War.
Timeline
1913
Adolf Hitler moves from Vienna to Munich and goes on selling watercolour views through dealers and to visitors.
1999
The International Museum of World War II opens in Natick, Massachusetts, a private collection shown by reservation.
5 December 2015
Lee Wright photographs the watercolour on display at the museum. The photograph is the image on this page.
1 January 2016
Copyright in Hitler's work expires in Germany and Austria, and in the United States for works never published in his lifetime.
2019
The Natick museum closes. Where its collection went, and who holds this watercolour, has not been established.
2019
German police seize sixty-six suspected fake Hitler works from two auction houses in two months, on suspicion of document forgery and fraud.
Frequently asked questions
Where is this Hitler watercolour now?
Nobody has said. It was on display at the International Museum of World War II in Natick, Massachusetts, until that museum closed in 2019, and no record of where the collection went has been found. The picture has not been reported at auction, in a museum or in a named private collection since.
Is the painting genuine?
It is attributed to Adolf Hitler and has not been authenticated. The subject and the technique fit the Munich watercolours he sold in 1913 and 1914, but no conservation report, exhibition catalogue or documented ownership chain has been published for it. Given how many forgeries are in circulation, an attribution of this kind should be read as a claim awaiting evidence.
Was it really a gift to Rudolf Hess?
That is what the description filed with the 2015 photograph says, and no supporting document has been found. There is no museum label, catalogue entry or sale record behind the claim in the public record, so it cannot be treated as established provenance.
Who took the photograph, and why is it credited?
Lee Wright, who photographed the watercolour on display in Natick on 5 December 2015 and released the picture under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 licence. That licence permits reuse on the single condition that the photographer is named. The painting is out of copyright; the photograph of it is not.
Did Hitler paint the Viktualienmarkt from life?
Almost certainly not, on the evidence of how he worked. He copied his views from postcards, prints and photographs rather than painting on the spot, which is why the same Munich and Vienna landmarks recur across the sheets attributed to him.
Can Hitler's paintings be bought and sold?
Yes. They are sold openly at auction in Germany and elsewhere, and the German law on Nazi symbols does not reach a market square or a church tower. The legal trouble the trade attracts is about forgery: the seizures at auction houses in Berlin and Nuremberg in 2019 were made on suspicion of document forgery and fraud.
Why does a watercolour of a market square matter?
Because it can be located in the record, which most works of its kind cannot. Photographs of this sheet on public display, with a stated licence and a named photographer, make it one of a small number of pictures attributed to Hitler whose recent history can be checked at all. What follows from that is a documented gap rather than a story: the museum closed, and the trail stops.



