
The Early Diary of Anaïs Nin, 1927–1931
The diary volume that records this book being written.
Read our take
by Anaïs Nin
Her first book: a defense of Lawrence written in sixteen days, published in Paris in 1932 — the door her whole literary life walked through.
Nin's first published book was criticism: a short, fervent study of D. H. Lawrence, written in a burst in 1931 and published in Paris by Edward Titus in 1932, two years after Lawrence's death, when defending him still took nerve. The 'unprofessional' of the title is a flag, not an apology — she reads Lawrence as a fellow practitioner of instinct, the first sustained case for him as a novelist of feeling rather than a scandal. The book changed her life on a technicality: her publisher's circle led to the lawyer Osborn, and through him to Henry Miller. (Criticism — nothing to spoil.)
The apprentice diarist of the early volumes ends and the public writer begins here. Written at Louveciennes in roughly sixteen days, the study argues what was then a minority position: that Lawrence — dead in 1930, notorious for Lady Chatterley — was a serious artist of the interior life, and that his readers of scandal had missed his readers' book. Nin's method is the one her fiction would use: sympathetic entry rather than judgment, the critic as medium.
Edward Titus published it in Paris in 1932 in a small edition, and its consequences outran its sales. The Lawrence connection gave Nin her first literary identity, and the book's circle of introductions led directly to the meeting at Louveciennes that opens the famous Diary. Reprinted decades later by Swallow, it remains the earliest published evidence of the sensibility the diary was privately rehearsing.
A short study in Nin's intuitive mode: chapters on Lawrence's treatment of instinct and the unconscious, his women characters — whom she reads with particular authority — his prose rhythms, and the religious seriousness beneath the scandals. Less analysis than advocacy: the book's argument is that Lawrence must be read from inside his method, and its demonstration is Nin doing exactly that.
The public debut of the sensibility the early diaries rehearse — criticism as self-portrait.
A defense of Lawrence's seriousness written when it was still a minority position.
Without this book, no Osborn, no Miller at Louveciennes, and a different Diary entirely.
1931
Written in a roughly sixteen-day burst at Louveciennes, from her Lawrence immersion of the period.
1932
Edward Titus publishes the study in Paris; its introductions lead toward the Miller meeting.

The diary volume that records this book being written.
Read our take
The famous consequence: the introductions it generated open the Diary's first pages.
Read our take

The novel that made defending Lawrence necessary — published in Paris by Edward Titus, the same man who published this study.
Read our takeThis one — D. H. Lawrence: An Unprofessional Study, published in Paris by Edward Titus in 1932, before any of her fiction.
She discovered his work in the late 1920s and read him as a kindred artist of instinct and the interior life; the study defends him as a serious novelist at a time when his name mostly meant scandal.
It announces the method: a reader's and practitioner's study rather than an academic one — Nin argued Lawrence had to be read by temperament.
Through its publishing circle she met the lawyer Richard Osborn, who introduced Henry Miller — the meeting at Louveciennes that opens the published Diary.
Yes — the Swallow Press reprint keeps it available as the earliest published Nin.