by Anaïs Nin
The second unexpurgated volume: the analysts, the abortion chapter, and the reunion with her father that the 1966 Diary could only gesture at.
The unexpurgated diary's second volume covers 1932 to 1934 — the same years as the first published Diary's darkest stretch, now with nothing removed. Its center is the material that gives the book its stark title: the 1933 reunion with her father, the composer Joaquín Nin, which the uncut journal records as a consummated incestuous affair — presented in her own words, without softening, alongside the analysts Allendy and Rank, the continuing Miller entanglement, and the volume's other famous restoration, the unflinching account of the stillbirth of 1934. Published in 1992. (A diary — the closing pages wait behind the reveal.)
When the estate began restoring what the 1966 Diary had cut, this was the hardest volume, and the title announced that nothing would be euphemized. The published Diary of 1931–1934 had rendered the father's return as a strange psychological duel, refused; the journal as written records something else — the affair with her father at Valescure in the summer of 1933, entered into and eventually broken off, analyzed on the page with the same relentless attention she gave everything. Readers and biographers have debated the episode ever since; the volume's value is that the primary record, whatever one makes of it, is on the table.
Around that center the volume restores the texture of the era: the double analysis (René Allendy, then Otto Rank, both of whom crossed the line from doctor to lover), the ongoing life with Henry Miller, the writing of House of Incest — whose title the diary's editors borrowed — and, at the volume's end, the August 1934 stillbirth, which the 1966 text had rendered in one famous scene and the journal records at full, harrowing length. It remains the most discussed and most disturbing volume of the whole diary project.
1932–1934, uncut: the Miller affair continuing past Henry & June's endpoint; analysis with Allendy, then with Rank, each relationship collapsing its professional frame; the composition of House of Incest out of the period's dreams; the reunion with Joaquín Nin and the affair the title names, recorded from approach through consummation to her deliberate ending of it; and the pregnancy of 1934, ending in the stillbirth the diary records with a directness that remains its most difficult and most cited passage.
The volume closes where the published Diary's first volume also closed, now with the record complete: the stillbirth of August 1934, written at length and without mercy for anyone, herself least of all; the final break with the father-enchantment, which the journal treats as the real ending of the era; and the departure for New York and Rank. The next unexpurgated volume, Fire, opens on the other side of the Atlantic.
In the October 23 entry, Nin's account of generosity repeatedly changes direction. She presents her encouragement of Henry and June as creative work, yet also admits exhaustion, resentment and the wish to stop making sacrifices. These positions remain beside one another rather than resolving into a final judgment. The diary's repeated returns to the evening make emotional time visible: confidence can be followed by doubt without either being erased. Its force comes partly from preserving these successive versions of the self, not from making the narrator consistent.
The opening entry places a planned journey to London beside the wish to move inward through the journal. Departure promises relief, but writing offers another kind of space in which experience can change its meaning. On October 30, the imagined prospect of Spain with Henry passes through a rapid sequence of mental pictures, enlarged and distorted by literary ambition. Travel is already entangled with the stories Nin tells about it. A new place cannot simply guarantee a new self when the imagination carries existing desires into the future.
Whatever one concludes about these years, this volume is the document the arguments rest on.
Read against the published Diary's same years, it is the sharpest demonstration of what editing can do.
The prose poem's dream material appears here in its raw state, alongside the life that produced it.
Depicts · 1933
The volume takes its title from him. The unexpurgated diary of 1932–1934, published in 1992, records the reunion with her father at Valescure in the summer of 1933 and the sexual relationship that followed, which ran about three months before she ended it. The material was cut from the diary published in her lifetime. The account is Nin's own and nothing outside it witnesses those days.
1932–1933
Analysis with Allendy, then Rank; the Miller relationship continues; House of Incest is being written from the period's dreams.
1933
The reunion with her father at Valescure becomes the affair the title names; she later ends it deliberately.
1934
The volume closes with the stillbirth, recorded at full length, and the departure for New York.
1992
Harcourt publishes the unexpurgated text.
The unexpurgated volume before this one — the Miller and June years, 1931–1932.
Read our take
The same years as the 1966 text printed them — the comparison is the education.
Read our take
The fiction distilled from these years' dreams, whose title the editors borrowed back.
Read our takeThe second volume of the unexpurgated diary, covering 1932 to 1934 — the uncut journal behind the first published Diary's years, including the material about her father that gives the book its title.
No. The volume contains Nin's own record of a consummated affair with her father, the composer Joaquín Nin, during their 1933 reunion — an episode the Diary as published in 1966 presented only as a refused psychological duel.
1992, by Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, from the journals Nin left — fifteen years after her death.
Her 1936 prose poem took its title and dream material from these years, with the 'incest' there figurative. The unexpurgated diary shows the biographical ground the fiction transformed — and the editors borrowed the title back, without the figuration.
It helps. Henry & June covers 1931–1932 and this volume continues directly, with the Miller relationship ongoing and the analysts and her father moving to the center.
Explore authors with a similar voice, perspective, and influence.
The entangled careers of the Villa Seurat: she financed and prefaced his scandal, he detonated her prose — and each wrote the other into the century's record.
View author
The doctor of the Paris slums who wrote the century's blackest, funniest novel — and changed the sound of French prose.
View author
War correspondent who covered the Spanish Civil War, D-Day, and conflicts across five more decades; Hemingway's third wife, 1940–1945.
View authorThe sources below include the primary text, editions, scholarship, archival materials, and other records that informed this page. They document Incest, its publication, and its place in literary history.
First-person evidence and historical context used in preparing the Incest page.
Used to place Incest within Anaïs Nin's life and published diaries.
Used for independent archival context surrounding the correspondence and diary material in Incest.
Used to cross-check chronology, relationships, and publication context relevant to Incest.
Used to verify Anaïs Nin's bibliography and place Incest within the broader chronology of Anaïs Nin's career.
Public opening excerpt: October 23 and 30, 1932. These readings do not establish the later father episode, the ending, or the symbolic ocean-voyage composition. No complete-volume or manuscript collation was made.
The primary text is the baseline reference for every book page. Additional references document publication history, interpretation, and historical context where that evidence is available.
Explore more resources