
The Myth of Sisyphus
Published in the same year, the essay defines the absurd that the novel approaches through Meursault's experience.
Read our take
by Albert Camus
A clerk in Algiers kills a man, then faces a court more interested in his behavior at his mother’s funeral.
Camus’s 1942 novel about Meursault, a French Algerian office worker whose flat first-person narration records a funeral, a beach killing and a trial without offering the feelings society expects. Short, exact and morally unsettling, it is the clearest entry point to Camus and should be read before the philosophical explanations built around it.
Meursault learns that his mother has died at a care home outside Algiers. He attends the vigil and funeral, but he does not perform the grief that the people around him expect. The next day he swims with Marie Cardona, begins a relationship with her and returns to his ordinary routine.[1]
Through his neighbor Raymond Sintès, Meursault becomes involved in a conflict with an unnamed Arab man. During a hot day at the beach, Meursault returns alone to a spring where the man is resting. The glare, heat and physical discomfort dominate Meursault's account of the moment in which he fires a revolver.[1]
The second half follows the investigation, trial and imprisonment. The court examines the killing, but witnesses spend striking amounts of time describing Meursault's behavior at his mother's funeral. The case becomes a judgment of whether he has the feelings and beliefs society expects a person to display.[1]
Part One begins with Meursault traveling from Algiers to his mother's care home in Marengo. He sits through the vigil, drinks coffee, smokes and declines to view the body. After the funeral he returns to Algiers, swims with his former coworker Marie Cardona and spends the evening with her. He later agrees to write a letter for Raymond Sintès, a neighbor who wants to punish his former mistress.[1]
Raymond's dispute draws Meursault and Marie to a beach house owned by Raymond's friend Masson. Raymond is cut in a fight with two Arab men, one of whom is the brother of his former mistress. Later, Meursault walks alone with Raymond's revolver. At a spring he meets one of the men again and shoots him once, then fires four more times into the body.[1]
Part Two follows Meursault in prison and at trial. The prosecutor builds a moral portrait from the funeral: Meursault did not cry, did not know his mother's exact age and went to a comedy film with Marie the next day. The court treats these facts as evidence that he is a dangerous person, while Meursault watches the proceedings with the same distance that marked his earlier narration.[1]
Coffee, warmth and the glare of the lamps occupy Meursault’s account where readers may expect an explanation of grief. Yet his hesitation before smoking shows that he notices the social question, even when he cannot see why the act should matter. The other mourners are equally hard for him to interpret: their silence first seems like indifference, an impression he later doubts. Their unexpected handshakes suggest a connection formed without conversation. The scene makes outward behavior an uncertain guide to what someone feels.
The balcony separates Meursault from the street without removing him from its social rhythms. He copies the tobacconist’s way of sitting, recognizes passersby and answers a greeting from the returning football crowd. His attention follows changing light, traffic and gestures rather than a plan for his own afternoon. This patient inventory makes the day feel both full of small events and difficult to get through. His closing thought that nothing has changed sits uneasily beside his mother’s absence and the solitary meal he has just prepared.
Mother died today. Or, maybe, yesterday; I can't be sure.Aujourd'hui, maman est morte. Ou peut-être hier, je ne sais pas.
The novel puts Camus’s central problem into a voice before giving it a philosophical vocabulary.
Meursault reports physical facts more readily than emotions. The gap between what he says and what other people expect drives both the style and the trial.
The novel can be read with Camus's philosophy, but it must also be read within French colonial Algeria and alongside criticism of the murdered man's anonymity.

A French Algerian office worker who narrates the funeral, killing and trial in a restrained first-person voice.

Meursault's former coworker and lover, who asks whether he loves her and whether he will marry her.

Meursault's neighbor, whose violent dispute brings the group into conflict at the beach.

The brother of Raymond's former mistress and the man Meursault kills. Camus does not give him a name.

A priest who asks Meursault to turn to God before his execution.
1938–1940
Albert Camus develops and writes the novel while living in Algeria and France.
1942
Gallimard publishes L’Étranger in occupied Paris.
1946
Stuart Gilbert's English translation appears as The Outsider in Britain and The Stranger in the United States.
1988
Matthew Ward's American translation restores Maman in the opening and adopts a more direct version of Meursault's voice.
2013
Kamel Daoud publishes The Meursault Investigation, a novel that gives a name and family history to the murdered man.


Published in the same year, the essay defines the absurd that the novel approaches through Meursault's experience.
Read our take
Both are first-person confessions shaped by judgment, but Jean-Baptiste Clamence manipulates his listener in ways Meursault does not.
Read our take
The later novel shifts from one isolated man to a community deciding how to act together.
Read our takeThe Stranger follows Meursault, a French Algerian office worker who kills an unnamed Arab man and is tried in a court that also judges his behavior at his mother's funeral.
Yes. The Stranger is the most accessible first Albert Camus book.
Gallimard first published L’Étranger in France in 1942, during the German occupation.
The Stranger and The Outsider are two English translations of the French title L’Étranger. The title on your copy depends on the publisher and translation.
The prosecutor uses Meursault's conduct at the funeral to argue that he lacks normal human feeling. The trial therefore judges his social behavior as well as the killing.
It is often taught as existentialist, but Albert Camus rejected that label for himself. The novel is more precisely connected to his idea of the absurd: the conflict between the human demand for meaning and a world that does not provide it.
Explore authors with a similar voice, perspective, and influence.

Both joined literary clarity to moral and political argument, and both distrusted systems that excuse present violence with a promised future.
View author
The third figure in the postwar Sartre-Beauvoir circle Camus argued with through the 1940s. Her later memoir Force of Circumstance gives one of the closest first-person accounts of Camus's Paris years and the 1952 break over The Rebel.
View author
The doctor of the Paris slums who wrote the century's blackest, funniest novel — and changed the sound of French prose.
View authorThe sources below include the primary text, editions, scholarship, archival materials, and other records that informed this page. They document The Stranger, its publication, and its place in literary history.

Primary French/English parallel text for the two illustrated passages in Part I, chapters I–II; not identified here as the Matthew Ward edition listed above.
Used to place The Stranger within Albert Camus's published work and verify its bibliographic context.
Used for independent biographical, archival, or historical context surrounding Albert Camus's career and the period in which The Stranger appeared.
Used to cross-check authorship, chronology, and the work's place in Albert Camus's wider catalogue.
Used to verify Albert Camus's bibliography and place The Stranger within the broader chronology of Albert Camus's career.
The primary text is the baseline reference for every book page. Additional references document publication history, interpretation, and historical context where that evidence is available.